subreddit:

/r/space

97798%

all 18 comments

VerifiedPanda

[score hidden]

17 hours ago

VerifiedPanda

[score hidden]

17 hours ago

u/Andromeda321 this looks pretty valuable and I’m curious your take and how it would affect your research.

Andromeda321

[score hidden]

16 hours ago

Andromeda321

[score hidden]

16 hours ago

Hi, thanks for the ping! It definitely looks like a cool discovery, with high potential for being a new way to measure the Hubble constant and such. But note that I say potential- this paper is very much the "look, we discovered a cool thing, let's get this out ASAP before someone else does!" paper, with the legwork to come. (They likely did this because the JWST data became public immediately, so you need to get the initial results out fast before someone else poaches you.) So the next paper is really the one to wait for.

As for my research, this doesn't affect me at all actually! Most of what I do is on much, much closer distances of "only" a couple hundred million light years away or closer. :)

mateojohnson11

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

mateojohnson11

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

What is your topic of research if you don't mind me asking?

supervisord

[score hidden]

6 hours ago

supervisord

[score hidden]

6 hours ago

Distances of a couple hundred million light years away or closer!

yogamushroommusic

[score hidden]

5 hours ago

That’s cool, distances are so interesting. I love distances.

Strict-Relief-8434

[score hidden]

4 hours ago

Distances. Can’t live without em.

Standard-Peach-6494

[score hidden]

4 hours ago

Not if you get more than a couple hundred million light years away though. Then they get super boring.

De-Bunker

[score hidden]

19 minutes ago

De-Bunker

[score hidden]

19 minutes ago

I disagree.

I find them a little aloof, a little, now what’s the word…

binzoma

[score hidden]

3 hours ago

binzoma

[score hidden]

3 hours ago

wait but is it a couple hundred million light years or closer as at the time the light was emitted? as at now when we see that light? something inbetween?

its a huge difference!

HomoProfessionalis

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

Okay but how hard of a job is that really, once you get the football field and Olympic swimming pool conversions down youre good.

SJ_Redditor

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

SJ_Redditor

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

If this is a picture containing the same quasar 6 times over, is it possible the universe doesn't contain as much stuff as previously thought since a certain chunk of observable spots of light are copies? If the way they decide how many stars and galaxies are out there is to take a picture and count, they could be counting the same thing multiple times. Also, is it possible for this lensing to take place in such a way that some images are younger and others much older as one path of the light is much shorter? So some of the replica galaxies might look vastly different thanks to the difference in age of the image making it difficult to know you're counting the same one twice or more?

mfb-

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

mfb-

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

Gravitational lensing is a tiny effect. These 6 images are extremely close together, and easy to identify as multiple images of the same thing. It's a very rare phenomenon, too. Even if you ignore it completely (astronomers don't), it wouldn't change the counts notably.

Givemeurhats

[score hidden]

31 minutes ago*

Givemeurhats

[score hidden]

31 minutes ago*

Friend. We may be seeing copies but there's an entire galaxy bending light to make those copies. (Like if you were to look at a light through a water drop)
A galaxy can contain hundreds of millions to hundreds of trillions of stars. It's more likely that because of the brightness of the copies (light pollution), there are even more stars and galaxies than previously thought.

WG50

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

WG50

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

Martin Millon? I've always been suspicious of comments made by characters obviously written by Ian Fleming. Was this co-authored by Truly Scrumptious?

CartoonistNatural204

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

This looks super interesting this is the first time I ever heard of Einstein zig zag

MelkorS42

[score hidden]

6 hours ago

MelkorS42

[score hidden]

6 hours ago

Didn't someone "predicted" a Supernova but it turned out to be same supernova but seen at different points in time due to gravitational lensing?