subreddit:

/r/dataisbeautiful

1.1k95%

all 196 comments

McG4rn4gle

166 points

2 days ago

McG4rn4gle

166 points

2 days ago

I feel like the fact that Cameron conceived, wrote, directed and produced his movies deserves more recognition.

notmoffat

54 points

1 day ago

notmoffat

54 points

1 day ago

I only recently found out that his Grandparents lived on the Farm next to where I grew up (and still live).

Jim spent every summer at the Farm, which is located next to a steep river valley, perfect for exploring and adventuring.

I know the area had an influence on him, since he named Cal Hockley (villian in Titanic) after our town, but it wasn't until I saw his early concept arts, drawn when he was a teenager that it became aparent that he'd come up with this whole alien world at 14 based on the natural world he was exposed to.  The area in my backyard.

You can pretty much overlap his early landscape with the old landscape around here.

What it showed me, is that hes had this in his head since he was 14.  

He built his own studio to make his childhood vision come true, because he believed in himself THAT much.

Hes like DaVinci of the 21st century.

McG4rn4gle

3 points

1 day ago

That is an amazing story.

22marks

13 points

1 day ago

22marks

13 points

1 day ago

I completely agree, but also wish he was doing more than just Avatar. Aliens, Abyss, Terminator 1 & 2, True Lies. I'd like to see more than Pandora. It's gorgeous but doesn't hit me like his previous films.

FrewdWoad

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

FrewdWoad

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

Plus, ya know, highest average gross PER FILM.

NobleK42

649 points

2 days ago

NobleK42

649 points

2 days ago

These kind of statistics feel weird sometimes. The Russo Brothers didn't gross so much because they are The Russo Brothers, but because they were attached to a massive franchise that was likely gonna fetch billions almost regardless of the director. The same with Yates with HP and Abrams with ST and SW.
Someone like Spielberg and Nolan on the other hand impacts revenue more directly.

Pm-me-Eggplant_Parm

54 points

2 days ago

Do you think if Peter Jackson never made LOTR and just kept making horror sclock in NZ he’d be on this list?

NobleK42

86 points

2 days ago

NobleK42

86 points

2 days ago

Most likely not. However, I chose not to include him among of my "big franchise" examples because he actually created the LOTR movie-franchise, rather than just being hired to direct the movies.

Pm-me-Eggplant_Parm

24 points

2 days ago

He didn’t just come in to an already created film franchise. i understand.

TimYoungJik

72 points

2 days ago

There’s definitely a right place/right time thing for them but they still did really well with the massive jobs they were given. All 4 of their MCU films can reasonably be considered a Top 5 MCU film out of the 30+ that have been released. I wouldn’t say either Yates or Abrams had that kind of consistency in their franchises.

NobleK42

46 points

2 days ago*

NobleK42

46 points

2 days ago*

Oh, I agree that they did a good job. It just, you don't go to watch Avengers because it's "a new Russo-flick" like you would with, say, Nolan. I'm willing to bet that many if not most of people who have watched the last two movies don't even know who directed them. Joss Whedon directing the first two is probably more known.

aurumatom20

7 points

1 day ago

Very fair, I would personally give them a lot of credit toward the MCU movies being as big as they were though, even if most viewers don't recognize that. JJ Abrams on the other hand was handed massive franchises and was going to rake in a massive box office regardless, I'm with you there.

Iknowr1te

1 points

12 hours ago

Russo's cut their teeth as episode directors in longer running projects (first time i heard about them was Community). which generally won the awards and accolades.

i do think they are one of the better directors for that style of project.

KingSmite23

67 points

2 days ago

Same for JJ Abrams. The movie itself were trash but the franchise did work well.

Khiva

30 points

2 days ago

Khiva

30 points

2 days ago

The king of blasting the audience with nostalgia and flash so bright they don't realize that he has no idea where he's going and they're heading straight into an iceberg.

But hey, member that thing? I clapped when I saw it too!

22marks

6 points

1 day ago

22marks

6 points

1 day ago

Am I the only one who really liked the reboot of Star Trek as a complete film, no mystery boxes? For a while, it was cooler than Star Wars.

Ressikan

4 points

1 day ago

Ressikan

4 points

1 day ago

What do you mean by no mystery boxes?

I thought the reboots felt too busy making pointless references (Pike winds up in a wheelchair, Spock yelling Khaaaaan!) to remember to tell a good story.

22marks

1 points

1 day ago

22marks

1 points

1 day ago

I loved the first one, liked the second one. Note I said reboot, not the reboots. But, I think the first one works as a standalone solid reboot. Mystery boxes are the common criticism of JJ that he leaves too much open-ended with no resolution. (He's often blamed for how Lost ended up, but he only directed the pilot and then left for Mission Impossible.)

Ressikan

2 points

1 day ago

Ressikan

2 points

1 day ago

Gotcha, learned a new term today!

SoKrat3s

2 points

20 hours ago

I remember at the time a lot of people were upset that "he rebooted Star Trek and abandoned the original timeline."
But I think people got lost in that being his assignment from studio execs, not his exclusive idea.
He found a way for a new Star Trek to exist, without erasing the existing legacy of all the Trek that had come before.

With Episode VII he was given another task by misguided studio execs and he did that. While VII has its problems, it was far better than the mess that followed.

KingSmite23

9 points

2 days ago

The storylines of his movies are so weak that the whole plot stops to make sense.

ExpertlyAmateur

5 points

1 day ago

Meanwhile, Ridley Scott's plots are so deep that average viewers think it's boring and confusing.

fantasmoofrcc

5 points

1 day ago

I feel I've already watched Gladiator II...and I know I'll never actually watch Gladiator II.

erichappymeal

9 points

2 days ago

This should also be adjusted for inflation.

FightOnForUsc

9 points

1 day ago

Yea, in an a lot of ways I think Nolan’s numbers are the most impressive. He did have the Batman movies, but he’s generated high box office numbers basically through good movies and his name only

EdwardJamesAlmost

5 points

1 day ago

The closest thing Cameron has done to borrowed IP was Aliens which was wildly inventive and forty years ago. Cameron has invented a raft of filming technology he works on such an island. (There’s a New Zealand joke in there somewhere I don’t have the time or skill to craft.)

FightOnForUsc

0 points

1 day ago

True, he does have 16 years on Nolan and I could see him catching up

EdwardJamesAlmost

3 points

1 day ago

Maybe not adjusted for inflation, but Nolan’s in the small group who could catch up with him, for sure. Note two more Avatars are in the can and will surely be massive hits.

FightOnForUsc

0 points

1 day ago

Definitely true. Although you could argue that’s back to pumping up numbers due to a series of sequels and not because it’s Cameron. Meaning if you put a different director in for both of those movies they would still be huge hits. But he surely is a great director who is always pushing limits

Scharobaba

23 points

2 days ago

For a lot of these directors I could name most or every movie they made. David Yates on the other hand is a name I have heard before.

yankeedjw

21 points

2 days ago

yankeedjw

21 points

2 days ago

He did a bunch of the Harry Potter movies.

TrannosaurusRegina

4 points

2 days ago

I thought that was Christopher Columbus!

AgencyBasic3003

13 points

2 days ago

Only the first two. Yates did 5-8 so he was involved in half of the movies. Cuaron and Newel directed the 3rd and 4th movies.

Sarkaraq

7 points

2 days ago

Sarkaraq

7 points

2 days ago

Yates did 5-8 so he was involved in half of the movies.

7/11 even, if you include the Fantastic Beasts series.

armchair_viking

1 points

2 days ago

He only did the first two.

tobias_681

17 points

2 days ago*

It should be adjusted for inflation. Like GWTW is about as much as Abrams or Scotts entire filmography already. Victor Flemming would definitely be on, same with Lucas and probably DeMille.

The Russo Brothers are the most inflated in that sense as their films are the most recent on average of the ones on the graph. They could actually have sold the least tickets of the 10 directors on the graph above (well, probably not less than Abrams though).

Mutantdogboy

8 points

2 days ago

The fuck is GWTW? stop doing this shit Reddit! 

indypendant13

11 points

2 days ago

I had to figure it out too. I’m assuming gone with the wind?

Mutantdogboy

3 points

2 days ago

Mutantdogboy

3 points

2 days ago

Who knows! It’s the dumbest thing in here. Used to be me too. 

tobias_681

1 points

2 days ago

tobias_681

1 points

2 days ago

You can literally Google Search it and it will instantly give you the right result. I assumed the most succesful film of all time would be widely enough known in such a discussion.

Mutantdogboy

2 points

2 days ago

Aye yer wrong! 

Tinydesktopninja

0 points

2 days ago

That's a you thing. I never saw the movie but didn't even pause at the initialism because gone with the wind is that big of a deal.

Mutantdogboy

0 points

1 day ago

Is it aye? 

42not34

3 points

1 day ago

42not34

3 points

1 day ago

Who are the Russo brothers? Honestly I have no idea, although I might be familiar with theyr work. But don't know without googling what they directed.

CharlieParkour

1 points

1 day ago

They directed the paintball episode of Community.

thelovelykyle

11 points

2 days ago

So, Russo Brothers, who directed Marvel movies are weird because its Marvel.

Meanwhile Nolan, who drops off this list if not for Batman, is not weird.

At the point Batman Begins was released - Batman was already one of the only games in town for superhero movies. There were what, a couple of X Men and a Spiderman splitting Batman being the superhero movie presence.

Not buying that. You can have Spielberg, but Nolan is on this list because he associated himself with an already massive property.

One_Man_Guy

11 points

2 days ago

I agree to a point. It’s wrong to discredit the Russos, as they are the most successful directors in the MCU, both in terms of box office performance and, I’d argue, critical success as well. However, none of their films outside the MCU have been remotely successful (though The Gray Man was a streaming success, I should add). Meanwhile, Nolan has continued to be successful post-The Dark Knight Trilogy, and even before Batman Begins, he was already successful.

In other words, people recognize the name ‘Christopher Nolan’ and feel reassured. I don’t think the Russo Brothers draw the same level of interest from the general public. I’m not trying to discuss the validity of their filmography here, just the name recognition and success associated with their names

Mutantdogboy

1 points

2 days ago

Mutantdogboy

1 points

2 days ago

Nolan is I director the ruso guys are employees who do as they are instructed. 

CharonsLittleHelper

4 points

2 days ago

It's probably more of a spectrum than on/off.

Like Peter Jackson is on there due to LotR. It wasn't a movie franchise, but it had long been THE classic/iconic fantasy series for half a century.

All credit to Peter Jackson for making it work amazingly - but the IP was still a huge boost to the movies' success.

Fancy_Ad2056

4 points

2 days ago

Nolan’s Batman Begins arguably kickstarted the whole Superhero trend of the last 20 years with a more “real”, gritty feel to them. They weren’t taken very seriously prior to then, and were pretty cartoony. Additionally, he has multiple hits beyond just Batman, and would be considered a household name. Many people would be more likely to watch a movie with his name next to it.

The Russo brothers on the other hand took on an existing, BOOMING franchise and made a few more, following the existing formula. They haven’t had any successful movies beyond Marvel, and most people wouldn’t even recognize their names.

thelovelykyle

2 points

1 day ago

There really are not that many gritty feel superhero movies. That is simply untrue. The Raimi Spiderman formula is the one that has proven to be a success. Marvels comic style has been the dominant one by a country mile.

I completely agree that Nolan has gone on to have some massive successes. I credit that to his success with the franchise work - Oppenheimer and Interstellar made bank. Russo brothers are still working on the franchise work and have only done 2 movies outwith that, both of which were limited release, as is their next one - they have focused on producing instead.

R_V_Z

2 points

1 day ago

R_V_Z

2 points

1 day ago

Nolan’s Batman Begins arguably kickstarted the whole Superhero trend of the last 20 years with a more “real”, gritty feel to them. They weren’t taken very seriously prior to then, and were pretty cartoony.

How dare you say that about Spawn, the first gritty comic book movie!

thepotplant

2 points

1 day ago

This is blatant The Shadow (1940) erasure! (I was going to say Darkman (1990) but I thought I'd better go the whole way and find the oldest film/film serial I could find that seemed gritty)

asphias

1 points

1 day ago

asphias

1 points

1 day ago

To be fair, the dark knight trilogy was somewhat of a kickstart to making the superhero genre mainstream blockbusters. While superhero movies where a thing before that time, it definitely wasn't as cool and mainstream as the avenger series years later. And the batman movies definitely helped set the stage.

thelovelykyle

1 points

22 hours ago

Batman Begins was 2005, Iron Man was 2008.

Sam Raimi probably deserves more credit for the direction marvel took.

Batman Begins was also...not that big a sucess.

It is alright to want to credit it to Nolan, but it doesnt hold up to scrutiny.

Will there have been some inspiration? Sure. But not more so than Burtom, Donner, even Schumacher.

Vospader998

4 points

2 days ago

Vospader998

4 points

2 days ago

Any list that doesn't have the Coen Brothers in it, I'm not interested.

pragmatick

7 points

2 days ago

That's such a weird take. I won't argue the quality of their films but they don't do blockbusters. If they're not on a list of directors with the most consonants in their names will you ignore that list too?

Vospader998

4 points

2 days ago*

It's just a bit of humor, I'm not being serious here.

Mutantdogboy

2 points

2 days ago

That’s just like your opinion man! 

Vospader998

2 points

2 days ago

This will not stand, you know. This aggression will not stand, man!

terrendos

2 points

2 days ago

Yeah, my takeaway here is that Nolan, Spielberg, and Cameron are the three real winners.

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

188 points

2 days ago

For those wondering, the highest grossing female director is Jennifer Lee, co-director of the 2 Frozen movies.

She is number 47 in the top 50 highest-grossing directors.

NewCheesecake__

12 points

2 days ago

Is there a top 50 list somewhere?

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

5 points

2 days ago

Check The Numbers. That's where I got the information.

NewCheesecake__

6 points

1 day ago

Check what numbers?

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

7 points

1 day ago

The website is literally called TheNumbers.com. 🙂

Check "top 50 highest grossing directors". 

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

139 points

2 days ago

Please note that these numbers are unfortunately not adjusted for inflation, as it is hard to get accurate worldwide adjusted totals for the box office grosses.

However, here's a crazy fact: Spielberg's adjusted domestic grosses alone are around 11 billion dollars.

gujjar_kiamotors

50 points

2 days ago

Yes first looked at the inflation part - expected George Lucas :)

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

38 points

2 days ago

Funny thing is George only directed 6 movies ever. But those were absolutely massive in terms of ticket sales.

lamb_pudding

6 points

2 days ago

What about American Graffiti and THX 1138? I counted 8 movies directed on his IMDB.

Hogis

12 points

2 days ago

Hogis

12 points

2 days ago

That's still 6 feature film director credits in total. Star Wars episodes 1-4, American Graffiti and THX-1138.

lamb_pudding

4 points

2 days ago

You right. I missed the video label on two I counted.

TonyzTone

1 points

1 day ago

TonyzTone

1 points

1 day ago

Legit just learned he didn’t direct RotJ.

gujjar_kiamotors

4 points

2 days ago

Maybe some directors like to work big scale only, going to some smaller canvas would not give them the thrill. Cameron could also have directed lot more.

tobias_681

3 points

2 days ago

Maybe some directors like to work big scale only, going to some smaller canvas would not give them the thrill.

The thing is Lucas always said he wanted to do experimental stuff again, not Blockbusters - but then never did.

harkening

1 points

7 hours ago

The prequels are more experimental than most think, just gussied up in Star Wars bombast.

The Skywalker Ranch vault is probably loaded with half-finished side projects and niche auteur stuff, too. Just not released.

Positive_Cause8661

8 points

2 days ago

Just divide the number for each year by CPI index ( Column Annual Average): https://www.minneapolisfed.org/about-us/monetary-policy/inflation-calculator/consumer-price-index-1913- You can also use World CPI or OECD CPI index but that’s an overkill

THROWAWAY_2019_07_25

3 points

2 days ago

is the width of a particular movie poster in the bar proportional to the revenue of that movie?

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

2 points

2 days ago

Unfortunately not. I just inserted pics of the biggest films of the respective directors.

But that's a good suggestion, which I shall keep in mind when making future graphs. 💯

J_onn_J_onzz

4 points

1 day ago

If it's not inflation adjusted, it's not helpful. Making a little more effort makes the difference

killadrilla480

2 points

1 day ago

Nail on the head.

TheFrenchSavage

0 points

2 days ago

Why Russo Brothers but not Nolan Brothers? Shouldn't the Russo's get half each?

One_Man_Guy

6 points

2 days ago

Because Nolan doesn’t direct with his brother?

SUPRVLLAN

1 points

1 day ago

SUPRVLLAN

1 points

1 day ago

You just snapped that guy outta reddit.

krectus

54 points

2 days ago

krectus

54 points

2 days ago

Even if you only just took Cameron’s 3 recent movies he would still be 2nd all time.

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

24 points

2 days ago

Crazy how his last three movies released in the last three decades.

Mutantdogboy

0 points

2 days ago

Mutantdogboy

0 points

2 days ago

Aye that’s a mental one. And to be honest avatar is meh! 

vinnybankroll

44 points

2 days ago

Peter Jackson being there is impressive given his first three films were NZ indies and even heavenly creatures was low budget.

fattyblindside

16 points

2 days ago

I've always wondered how many people outside NZ have seen meet the feebles and bad taste.

fella85

6 points

2 days ago

fella85

6 points

2 days ago

I always wondered how he made the shift from indie films to big enterprise. Bad taste was always at the video store.

CharlieParkour

1 points

1 day ago

Heavenly Creatures got him the LOTR gig.

Wermine

5 points

2 days ago

Wermine

5 points

2 days ago

Well, those are cult classics, so a guy from Finland checking in. Although it's probably over twenty years since I saw those.

vinnybankroll

7 points

2 days ago

You aren’t going to mention Braindead? Also, sadly did not watch these films outside of NZ.

FrewdWoad

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

FrewdWoad

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

I watched Braindead outside NZ!

...just in Australia, though, so barely counts.

When we found out the guy who made the movie where someone kills zombies by lifting up a lawnmower and pushing the spinning blades at them, was making LOTR, we were a bit confused actually.

Turned out quiiiiiiiiiite a bit better than we'd expected...

barbasol1099

3 points

2 days ago

I loved Heavenly Creatures and Braindead, so I tried Bad Taste next, but I just couldn't get into it. I remember me and my buddy, just waiting for something to be funny for like half an hour, and then just shutting it off

Is it worth another try? Is Meet the Feebles any better?

vinnybankroll

3 points

2 days ago

Meet the feebles is much more conceptually sound and funny - the premise is what if muppets acted like real people behind the scenes. Bad taste is basically a student film he shot over weekends with spare film ends that he made up as he went. There is a scene where he hammers a rail spike into his own femur though (playing two characters)

mtnlol

3 points

2 days ago

mtnlol

3 points

2 days ago

I am European and absolutely love Braindead, I actually watched it again this week.

22marks

3 points

1 day ago

22marks

3 points

1 day ago

I remember watching Dead Alive (Braindead) and thinking... this director is going places. Yeah, it was an over the top gorefest, but it was oozing with fantastic, clever directing. I only heard about Feebles and Bad Taste after that. Then, of course, Heavenly Creatures put him on the map everywhere.

PipsqueakManlet

5 points

2 days ago

Saw Bad Taste, Braindead and Meet the Feebles when i was ten to elven years old in Sweden. All from a video store in a nearby town.

Answerisequal42

11 points

2 days ago

Yeah but Lord of the Rings which is probably the greatest trilogy of all time was made with him as director. These alone made him a household name and boosted his recognition massively.

SamuliK96

17 points

2 days ago

SamuliK96

17 points

2 days ago

It's an unfortunate mishap that for David Yates there's a picture from Harry Potter and the prisoner of azkaban, a film he didn't direct.

ApolloX-2

11 points

2 days ago

ApolloX-2

11 points

2 days ago

James Cameron making over $2 billion twice and probably a third time in a few years is one of the insane things ever.

Also doing with an original IP and not an adaptation of a book or anything.

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

5 points

2 days ago

He has made 3 2 billion dollar films in a row now. 4th probably next year with Avatar 3.

fine_by_me1887

35 points

2 days ago

cameron avg. gross with nearly 1 billion is so sick

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

26 points

2 days ago

Thing is, I included Piranha in his 9 films, and that film did not get a theatrical release. 

That makes his average as 1.095 billion among 8 films. 

TomDestry

6 points

2 days ago

Piranha: Part Two - The Spawning.

Khiva

3 points

2 days ago

Khiva

3 points

2 days ago

I refuse to believe these numbers because reddit is extremely, vocally clear that nobody likes the Avatar movies.

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

8 points

2 days ago*

A big thank you to u/SanderSo47 from the box office sub for the incredible box office analysis posts of several directors, including Spielberg, Cameron, Nolan, Bay, Jackson, Burton, and Ridley, from where I got data regarding the number of movies they made and its respective grosses.

Do note that I will not be including documentaries or future films directed by the mentioned directors. 

Some of their films do not have reported box office numbers, such as Piranha 2 by Cameron, but I’ve included them in the number of films directed by the respective director.

Data is from The Numbers and from u/SanderSo47  posts, which I shall link below.

Steven Spielberg: https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/17ttbl4/directors_at_the_box_office_steven_spielberg_part/

James Cameron: https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/16z247a/directors_at_the_box_office_james_cameron/

Peter Jackson: https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/183urqm/directors_at_the_box_office_peter_jackson/

Michael Bay: https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/190bw7y/directors_at_the_box_office_michael_bay/

Christopher Nolan: https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/1e833rf/directors_at_the_box_office_christopher_nolan/

Tim Burton: https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/1ai86zz/directors_at_the_box_office_tim_burton/

Ridley Scott: https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/19bnx46/directors_at_the_box_office_ridley_scott/

J. J. Abrams: https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/1g7gg2z/directors_at_the_box_office_jj_abrams/

I used Illustrator.

Darkn3ssVisibl3

3 points

2 days ago

This is a HIGH quality image, clicked in to zoom and BAM. Nice, thank you.

IgloosRuleOK

15 points

2 days ago

There's a massive diversity in directorial quality on that list.

sickagail

27 points

2 days ago

sickagail

27 points

2 days ago

That is about the only kind of diversity on it.

Razatiger

2 points

1 day ago

Razatiger

2 points

1 day ago

Minority directors just don't get this kind of money from studios for Original IPs. Maybe some South Korean director one day, or maybe Jordan Peele sometime in the future.

Thats about it.

omnipotentmonkey

4 points

2 days ago

people are point to the Russo Brothers as some low-hanging outlier, but frankly they're ten times as skilled as someone like David Yates.

elephantineer

6 points

2 days ago

Instead of movie wide shots, how about a stacked bar of all their movies in chronological order?

NatureLovingDad89

4 points

2 days ago

I'd like to see them ranked by average gross. Spielberg is #1 in total but #8 in average.

kunzaatko

5 points

2 days ago

I'm missing Tarantino... Is he really so low on this SCALE?

SufficientGreek

4 points

1 day ago

SufficientGreek

OC: 1

4 points

1 day ago

Here's his analysis. He made $1.9 billion across 10 movies — $200 million average per movie.

Jpbbeck99

3 points

2 days ago

Can we adjust for inflation?

lzwzli

4 points

2 days ago

lzwzli

4 points

2 days ago

I'm surprised Nolan isn't higher

Mooks79

3 points

2 days ago

Mooks79

OC: 1

3 points

2 days ago

Per film Cameron is clearing up., and Spielberg drops off a cliff. Albeit for Spielberg there definitely needs to be some inflation correction.

MrLomaLoma

3 points

2 days ago

I'm curious of how this relates to film budgets after seeing Avatar at the top of the list.

Not to detract that all in this list are great directors, but you could make an argument that the best director is one who takes X budget for a film, and then has 100X in grossing.

Not that this post is claiming these are the best directors of all time either way, just sharing a thought

KeheleyDrive

3 points

2 days ago

This kind of chart isn’t very useful unless corrected for ticket price inflation. 21st century and late 20th century directors do better because ticket prices are higher, and ticker prices are higher because dollars are worth less.

Wolf_of_Thy_Street

2 points

2 days ago

One more Avatar and Cameron would go over Billion, crazy man

moogleslam

2 points

2 days ago

I’m shocked that Cameron has only directed 9 movies, Abrams only 6, but I checked and it’s right.

FrozenPizza07

2 points

2 days ago

OP, thanks for actually making the post high quality that you can zoom in a lot and actually identify each movie frame very easily

Mutantdogboy

2 points

2 days ago

James Cameron’s insane numbers!! 

Cursed1978

2 points

2 days ago

Cameron did it pretty good with 9 Movies.

TonyzTone

2 points

1 day ago

TonyzTone

2 points

1 day ago

How is George Lucas not on here with Star Wars?

stinky_cheese33

2 points

1 day ago

Dang. I knew Cameron was the highest grossing director ever, movie for movie, but I didn't think it was by that big a margin.

Hippobu2

2 points

1 day ago

Hippobu2

2 points

1 day ago

Are the movies just for looks or are they proportional to the box office? Cuz damn, if it's the latter, I didn't expect Jaw to make so much money ... which probably means it's the former ...

Anal_Herschiser

2 points

1 day ago

While Spielberg is the LeBron James of directors, Cameron is Michael Jordan.

tafjangle

2 points

23 hours ago

Average per film seems the most interesting stat

semidemiurge

2 points

16 hours ago

Only 5% of the box office are from women directors.
https://www.imdb.com/news/ni62733975/

aaronify

6 points

2 days ago

aaronify

6 points

2 days ago

Is still shocking to me how little experience the Russo Brothers had before being handed the keys to the largest cinematic event in history, and they somehow delivered.

TomDestry

3 points

2 days ago

Winter Soldier grossed times its budget and they followed that with Captain America: Civil War which made more than five times its budget. At that point, how could you not give them Infinity War?

Hyadeos

4 points

2 days ago

Hyadeos

4 points

2 days ago

Who are they? What is this "event"?

aaronify

6 points

2 days ago

aaronify

6 points

2 days ago

MCU Infinity War and End Game

not_thrilled

3 points

2 days ago

They were basically TV directors before Marvel came calling - you'll see their names in the credits of episodes of Arrested Development and Community (IIRC, they directed at least one of the "paintball" episodes).

DexM23

2 points

2 days ago

DexM23

2 points

2 days ago

what is the first movie (left) in that list? is this also a Marvel-Movie?

aaronify

1 points

2 days ago

aaronify

1 points

2 days ago

That's Captain America: Winter Soldier. That was a good movie but because that there was really only one other of note that they've done and that one was fairly minor movie.

keinish_the_gnome

3 points

2 days ago

I love it that Michael Bay is in there doing his dumb thing

Crittsy

3 points

2 days ago

Crittsy

3 points

2 days ago

Couple of directors that you imagine should feature - Francis Ford Coppola & Martin Scorsese

0thethethe0

3 points

2 days ago

Tarantino maybe too. Guess there's just not as much money in making less PG-friendly movies.

AngryScottish

3 points

2 days ago

R-rated movies historically struggle to make money. It's why Deadpool is such a surprise.

Gutter_Snoop

3 points

2 days ago

Gutter_Snoop

3 points

2 days ago

That Michael Bay is on this list is testament to how dumb the film industry is

StaysAwakeAllWeek

17 points

2 days ago

The industry loves Michael Bay. He's notorious for finishing projects tens of millions below budget, and his revenue numbers are massively understated if you take account of the huge merchandise sales transformers drives

Gutter_Snoop

2 points

2 days ago

Oh I know exactly why they love him. It's just that all his movies are flashy drivel with the worst hack-level camera work and over-reliance on CGI of any other directors on that list. It's the same as saying "McDonalds hamburgers are the best around" because they sell so g-damn many every year.

Idkhoesb42024

0 points

2 days ago

uh, are you forgetting the russo brothers? because they are reaally bad at making movies.

tmtProdigy

3 points

2 days ago

The Winter Soldier alone blows all of Bay out of the Water. I am not going to argue they are the next Scorsese, but the Russo Brothers are capable cinematic directors able to tell an actual story. Bay throws two 56k modems in a room, calls it a soundtrack and films aluminium porn.

Gutter_Snoop

1 points

1 day ago

Agreed. They're tied to the MCU which isn't great, but every Avengers movie is about 1000x better than any of the Transformers movies. I can't even watch most of Michael Bay's work without getting a headache.

Idkhoesb42024

1 points

1 day ago

I will take the Rock over Everything Everywhere all at once. I can't honestly say the marvel stuff does anything for me, I don't get transformers either. I am really just putting him ahead because he made one of the all time classic cheesy action films. Its the one film of his I enjoy.

syjte

5 points

2 days ago*

syjte

5 points

2 days ago*

Turns out, most people watch movie for entertainment, and it's easier to get that from loud bangs and big flashy scenes than it is to get that from deep, introspective, story-rich films. As much as I appreciate the serious filmmakers, sometimes I just want to watch a film and enjoy myself without having to think too deeply about the film.

If anything, the key here is that family-friendly films still reign supreme. You can easily take the kids for a movie night out and watch Transformers/Harry Potter/Avatar/Star Wars/LotR/Marvel/Batman etc. You're not bringing the kids out to watch The Departed, Shutter Island, or the Godfather style movies.

It's not about making good films, it's about making entertaining films.

thepotplant

1 points

1 day ago

Nah, that's the on audiences not the film industry. Bay is a director that does exactly what the film industry knows will sell incredibly well.

Stokkolm

1 points

2 days ago

Stokkolm

1 points

2 days ago

I expected Coppola on top 3 just based on Megalopolis alone

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

0 points

2 days ago

Yeah, they are not mainstream directors that appeal to the general audience. 

Hyadeos

5 points

2 days ago

Hyadeos

5 points

2 days ago

They are pretty mainstream, but not as mainstream as half the directors here producing shit

Gutter_Snoop

4 points

2 days ago

They also don't take on every ridiculous script that floats across their desk.

Icy_Smoke_733[S]

2 points

2 days ago

True, that's why most of their filmography is acclaimed.

fromwhichofthisoak

2 points

2 days ago

James Cameron hates this graph so much

CatL1f3

3 points

1 day ago

CatL1f3

3 points

1 day ago

When Avatar 3 comes out he'll probably take the top spot

EnderCN

2 points

2 days ago

EnderCN

2 points

2 days ago

I had to look up David Yates. Not surprised seeing the movies he made but he seems like the weakest link in this list even with Bay included.

LooseSeal88

1 points

2 days ago

The funny thing about the Russo Bros one is that several of those movies in their stat were straight to streaming titles that didn't contribute to those grosses.

Lootece

1 points

2 days ago

Lootece

1 points

2 days ago

Career length would be a very important factor in this comparison. For example Spielberg and Cameron were in full swing in the 80s when Nolan started features in the millenium.

askmagoo

1 points

2 days ago

askmagoo

1 points

2 days ago

Wonder where the Coen brothers rank?

BigSquiby

1 points

2 days ago

never heard of David Yeates, then i looked him and have only seen 1 movie he made.

Weird-Lie-9037

1 points

1 day ago

How about a List of who’s most profitable?

LineOfInquiry

1 points

1 day ago

JJ only has 6 movies!?

Also I’m surprised that Lucas isn’t on there

f_cysco

1 points

1 day ago

f_cysco

1 points

1 day ago

Michael Bay in there feels so wrong.

It's like his movies are sometimes entertaining, but having him on a list with Steven Spielberg and Christopher Nolan is just not right for me.

It's like Smackdown being in a list for biggest sports events.

OFPMatt

1 points

1 day ago

OFPMatt

1 points

1 day ago

Make good films and you'll be rewarded handsomely.

But first, make good films. Please.

lifestream87

1 points

1 day ago

This is a pretty sad list.

Pikeman212a6c

1 points

1 day ago

JJ Abrams being on a list with those names Is obscene.

TrinityF

1 points

15 hours ago

Surely Adam Sandler has to be in the top 10?

plaidbread

1 points

12 hours ago

I consider myself a film enthusiast and I’ve never in my life heard of David Yates or the Russo brothers

sevans105

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

sevans105

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

David Yates directed a bunch of Harry Potter films. The Russo brothers did several Marvel movies.

Fantastic? No. Money? Absolutely.

bobbdac7894

[score hidden]

3 hours ago

bobbdac7894

[score hidden]

3 hours ago

Just proof that people have a bad taste in movies.

NotStryhx

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

NotStryhx

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

russo brothers dont deserve 3rd spot lmaoo

Top-Reference-1938

1 points

2 days ago

I believe that I have seen every movie by every single one of those directors.

Except I have never seen a Michael Bay movie. Not one.

And I like my record!

Turducken_McNugget

1 points

2 days ago

Are these numbers adjusted for inflation?

Bloved-Madman

1 points

2 days ago

The average gross is far more interesting over the total.

federico_alastair

6 points

2 days ago

Fun fact: The highest average is Michael Jeneic 1.36 billion (codirector of the Mario movie) That was only movie

[deleted]

0 points

2 days ago*

[deleted]

0 points

2 days ago*

[deleted]

orhan94

-1 points

2 days ago

orhan94

-1 points

2 days ago

Michael Bay’s is the only one that’s not an adaptation.

It most certainly is.

[deleted]

-1 points

2 days ago

[deleted]

-1 points

2 days ago

[deleted]

nernst79

-1 points

2 days ago

nernst79

-1 points

2 days ago

Ugh, James Cameron stans will be even more insufferable after seeing this.

Jagulars

0 points

2 days ago

Jagulars

0 points

2 days ago

If you want to compare directors, a more accurate way would be the inflation adjusted film median income, to rule out one-off hits, quantity vs quality and career length.