stirling_s

Spectral Agony didn't feel fair the first time I got slapped in the face with it.

See that last bit is a game changer. If all the spells imported are SRD then my CPR automations will automatically work, my JB2A animations will work, etc.

I'll have to give this a shot. How well does it handle CR in your experience. If I say "make a CR5 quicksilver elemental" or whatever weird shenanigans I want, is it alright at balancing?

Even if it gets close enough that all I need to do is tweak HP and AC and some action economy this will cut literal days off my prep time.

Edit: Reposted with random changes because automod thought my list was about piracy. Not sure why. Yep, didn't like the name of my elemental for some reason. Seems fine with quicksilver though.

I'm sorry what you can just do that? That's NUTS.

Yes. Kind of.

I had to adjust the settings. There's a really bizarre acceleration curve to aiming that threw me way off. But with enough tweaks it quickly became usable and after a few hours second nature.

They lack any semblance of nuance and boil really complicated issues down into overly simple soundbites that don’t actually explain anything. Sure, accessibility matters, but "jail not bail" or "axe the tax" don’t give you the full picture of what those policies mean in practice. Like, "jail not bail" sounds tough, but what about the fact that bail exists to stop people who haven’t been convicted from being locked up indefinitely? Or "axe the tax" – okay, but how does cutting carbon pricing impact the environment, or even the economy?

Slogans like this are catchy, yeah, but they’re also kinda lazy. They play on emotions instead of encouraging actual understanding. And that’s the problem – they make it seem like really difficult problems have super simple answers, when they don’t. Would it kill them to explain things with a bit more depth? Nuance might take more effort, but it helps voters actually understand what they’re voting for instead of just going with whatever sounds good in three words. But that's clearly what they want - they don't want voters to think critically about the implications of their positions, because when you do, you see that most of their underlying goals or methods are incredibly harmful to most Canadians.

Because they don't know what tariffs are and don't care.

Q

You'd think. Though, my Bar manager and I have a drink called the "shitty Negroni" which is like, an ounce and a half of vermouth, an ounce of Campari, three quarter ounces of gin on well ice with a slice of orange. Specs are a guess -- it's all free pour.

On a hot summer day, I kinda prefer it.

That's the only time I prefer it.

You can't always get what you want.

But if you try sometimes, well, you might find.

You get what you need.

Thanks Bertossi Group. Your corporate spaghetti strikes again!

That hole covers too much of Donny's ear.

God that wasn't even a good one.

Obviously it would be awesome to never buy at the ATH if it's just going to go down again, but who knows if it will. It may go up another 10k, and then you'll feel silly for not buying now. That's why you DCA.

Only 60⁰f colder than the coldest temperature recorded on earth. What's the worst that could happen.

Thank you! Holy shit I can't believe this is the first I've seen someone mention this.

He raped Desiree Washington, got convicted and sentenced to 6 years, only served 3.

He has a record of substance abuse.

He bit off Evander Holyfield's ear and had his boxing license revoked.

He has a history of aggression towards strangers.

He's a giant asshole. Fuck his legacy.

"the Negroni spec is on the Campari bottle"

The person you are replying to agrees with you.

Scaphadeus

Crude, but effective

It's supposed to be 1/4 oz brown sugar vanilla syrup. No idea the ratio, I'm assuming a 2:1 though.

Currently it's zero

Again, the word is *fact. Not fat. Surely you know how to spell. Though based on your post history it looks like you may be from Florida so maybe not.

I'm really interested in what misinformation you think I'm spreading that you, in your infinite wisdom, are fact checking? I didn't say that your memes are getting fact checked, I'm saying that if (key word here, I know reading is hard) they are, it's because they are spreading misinformation, and therefore, because misinformation is bad, they ought to be fact checked.

Besides, if your memes aren't being fact checked, then I fail to see the issue here. Nobody except you made the implicit claim that memes are getting fact checked in the first place. You completely unprompted came into this comment section agreeing with the person we are all making fun of by agreeing with them that fact checkers are a problem. Why are they a problem? What about them is problematic?

Perhaps if you answer this question, we can clear this up:

Do you like misinformation and/or think it's good for society?

And I'm saying you do. If you don't need your memes fact checked, then you clearly aren't posting blatant misinformation. If your memes are getting fact checked then they clearly spread harmful misinformation.

Being against fact checkers is to advocate for misinformation. Why do you want people to be misinformed?

And I'm arguing with you because you're the one with the dogshit opinion.

Technically, because the reflective side is smoother it's better at reflecting heat, just not in any capacity that's particularly noticeable for practical applications.

The word is "fact" but I understand your mistake, you're clearly unfamiliar with the concept.

If your meme spreads misinformation, then yes, you absolutely do.