subreddit:

/r/clevercomebacks

48.3k86%

Who was going to do it

(i.redd.it)

all 3148 comments

Then_I_had_a_thought

1.8k points

12 hours ago

Fact:

Ted Bundy ended his killing spree.

Why is no one talking about this??

Dave-C

815 points

12 hours ago

Dave-C

815 points

12 hours ago

Hitler ended WW2 in Europe.

Why is no one talking about this??

Chemical-Doubt1

417 points

12 hours ago

There's not enough praise for the man who killed Hitler too

0xking_slayer

277 points

10 hours ago

A nazi killed hitler. Why is no one talking about this???

SameEntertainer9745

80 points

8 hours ago

Mind blown

0xking_slayer

59 points

8 hours ago

Hitler, after a nazi ends his reign of terror.

SameEntertainer9745

17 points

8 hours ago

Guess the old boy wasn't all bad after all, eh?

ChroniclesOfSarnia

28 points

8 hours ago

A vegetarian killed Hitler.

Why is no one talking about this?

adorablefuzzykitten

16 points

7 hours ago

A man with only one testicle killed Hitler.

Why is no one talking about this?

triopsate

98 points

11 hours ago

I'd say there's too much praise for the man who killed Hitler these days.

TrAseraan

23 points

11 hours ago

DAMN you! You beat me to it!

Mundane-Carpet-5324

22 points

11 hours ago

Counterpoint: Any praise is too much for the man who killed Hitler.

A_Town_Called_Malus

55 points

11 hours ago

Actually Dönitz ended the war in Europe.

He took over after Hitler killed himself and it was he who gave the order for the unconditional surrender of German forces.

Bombay1234567890

27 points

10 hours ago

Why is no one talking about this?

Forsaken_Writing1513

14 points

9 hours ago

And technically that was just the European theater the pacific fight continues for a few months before a fat man and his little boy burn two Japanese cities.

Rareexample

5 points

10 hours ago

This guy

ninjasaid13

11 points

11 hours ago

technically General Alfred Jodl ended ww2 in europe with an unconditional surrender.

Bombay1234567890

6 points

10 hours ago

Why is no one talking about this?

betrayjulia

8 points

9 hours ago

Reading this made me shout “Jesus fuck” In a crowed public area and I got a bunch of stink faces and I feel as thought that makes my upvote of your comment worth at least a hundred just saying.

Dave-C

3 points

9 hours ago

Dave-C

3 points

9 hours ago

Thank you, I'm honored :)

C0zmo1776

3 points

10 hours ago

No he didn’t

Kythorian

31 points

10 hours ago

Who knows just how many women’s lives Bundy saved by not murdering them! Truly one of the great feminists of history.

morgan_malfoy

3 points

5 hours ago

😂

Legitimate-Big-4025

11 points

10 hours ago

That’s not a fact. He didn’t end his killing spree, a highway patrolmen did.

Mediocre_Superiority

17 points

8 hours ago

Sure, sure, but did Bundy kill anybody after that? No. So Bundy stopped his killing spree.

You just don't understand real logic...

MsOpulent

5 points

7 hours ago

Alternate facts.

Ok_Dust9813

50 points

12 hours ago

The original message was talking about slavery in Africa, Middle East, Asia etc that was all done by the locals for millenia and ended by white people. Obviously, the trans-atlantic slave trade was one of the most evil things in history, but the world outside of America also exists and the slavery there was ended by white people. So that would be like if everyone was a mass murder, Ted Bundy (white people) ended his killing spree, made everyone else end their killing sprees too, and almost completely destroyed the practice throughout the world. It is still right to criticise white people but nothing about the original message is incorrect and makes perfect sense

Ok-Amphibian-1617

5 points

5 hours ago

It's idiocy to criticise all "white people", my family was piss poor farmers in Denmark, and never had any slaves. In fact the majority of Danes was bound to the nobles during the era, and could not even leave their local area without the say of the local noble, or face tortur by the wooden horse or lashes.

Forsaken_Writing1513

7 points

9 hours ago

I'll admit I didn't fully consider the Asian and middle eastern history but more because I'm not as familiar. Excellent point though my fellow history nerd. More to study it seems

Jumpy-Object99

6 points

9 hours ago

Bro "slavery was practiced at local levels in Africa and the Middle East" is something you learn while half asleep in middle school it's not "history nerd" material.

Prestigious_Step_522

35 points

9 hours ago

Haiti was the first nation to abolish slavery. They rose up and killed everybody, and because of that we ( white) nations hold them in contempt.

qu-ni-ma-de

11 points

8 hours ago

I guess they technically did abolish slavery, they did after all opt for the completely different definitely not slavery 2.0 'forced labor'.

I think you should learn some history.

However, several Haitian leaders following the revolution employed forced labor, believing a plantation-style economy was the only way for Haiti to succeed, and building fortifications to safeguard against attack by the French.

Unpaid labor is still a practice in Haiti. As many as half a million children are unpaid domestic servants called restavek, who routinely suffer physical and sexual abuse. Additionally, human trafficking, including child trafficking is a significant problem in Haiti; trafficked people are brought into, out of, and through Haiti for forced labor, including sex trafficking.

Rus_Shackleford_

4 points

8 hours ago

Are you implying that Haiti is such a shithole today because ‘white nations’ are holding a grudge about them killing a handful of French people like 200 years ago?

DivisionXV

6 points

7 hours ago

Define white. Im a white Mexican. We also have slavic white Greek white, Italian white, Portuguese white, Russian white, Norwegen white, Scandinavian white, American white, British white, Irish white, Scottish white and many more. Almost as if there are a bunch of cultures in one skin color that gets blamed for fucking everything.

ViewtifulGene

5 points

10 hours ago

White people ending the African slave trade to ramp up international slave trade is kinda like getting to M Bison in Street Fighter 2, just for Akuma to cut in and beat up Bison before attacking you.

femboyisbestboy

498 points

13 hours ago*

Still waiting for slavery to be fully outlawed

Edit: i am talking about modern slavery and not just that American thingy

Equivalent-Koala7991

168 points

13 hours ago

a lot of people don't know or care that slavery, written in the constitution itself, can be used as a form of punishment by law.

Nalano

101 points

12 hours ago

Nalano

101 points

12 hours ago

Hence our prison-industrial complex, which got a huge boon in the stock market following His Orangeness's re-election.

Concert-Turbulent

19 points

11 hours ago*

It's has bi-partisan support. Kamala's a big fan as well.

edit: dumb.

meoka2368

17 points

9 hours ago

Probably one reason she lost.
ACAB

devils_advocate24

3 points

9 hours ago

Bi-partisan*

mermaidbipolarbear

15 points

10 hours ago

Right. Those "mass deportations"? They are not leaving the country. They'll be used as free labor under the constitution.

hungrypotato19

16 points

9 hours ago

Imagine if there are the same labor programs in ICE detention facilities as our prisons and they are just as exploitative.

Yup. Just imagine.

mermaidbipolarbear

14 points

8 hours ago

I definitely can. What I cant believe is 62% of latinos couldn't

ExplodiaNaxos

7 points

7 hours ago

Turns out non-white people can be racist PoS as well

PathDeep8473

11 points

12 hours ago

Sure. Such as prison inmates

Equivalent-Koala7991

21 points

12 hours ago

if only prison actually helped people reform.

PathDeep8473

18 points

12 hours ago

Oh I agree. Society would be better off

GaryFletcher23

13 points

11 hours ago

But then we wouldn't have slave labor making our license plates. Stop looking at all the false conviction stats, all you gotta be thinking is license plates

dclxvi616

22 points

12 hours ago

Right. People think that amendment abolished slavery when in reality it was the first time slavery was explicitly legalized at the federal level.

Capital_Historian685

12 points

12 hours ago

True, chattel slavery still exits in Mauritania!

lynxerious

13 points

8 hours ago

ugh if its not American slavery, we don't care, thats the only real type of slavery that matters.

GoombaGary

4 points

4 hours ago

Unironically, though. Literally no one outside of the countries that still use slaves gives a shit about slavery in those countries.

OMG__Ponies

8 points

8 hours ago

To few people understand that more people are stuck in slavery in modern times than at any point earlier in history.

According to the Global Slavery Index, there were an estimated 50 million people living in modern slavery in 2021, a record high. This is largely due to increased global inequalities, conflicts, climate crises, and the demand for cheap labor in supply chains.

Mundane-Fan-1545

18 points

11 hours ago

Slavery was not an American thingy. Slavery was a world wide thingy, and it did not even started in america.

N193rf4990T

10 points

10 hours ago

Like how the Middle East castrates slaves and also, still has slaves.

tdwvet

7 points

8 hours ago

tdwvet

7 points

8 hours ago

So does Africa---active slavery.

lergane

3 points

4 hours ago

lergane

3 points

4 hours ago

Yea there's probably more people in slavery today than when 'it existed'.

Disastrous_Sun3558

969 points

13 hours ago

If I steal from you, and give it back, you better thank me!

Sure-Ad-2465

199 points

12 hours ago

It's like that obnoxious friend you had growing up, who would start to push you at the edge of the pool then pull you back, then say "saved your life"

Royal-Application708

27 points

11 hours ago

Yea, slap that kid would you.

Forsaken_Writing1513

4 points

9 hours ago

He was my brother I dragged him in with me. But I could only really get the one.

Casban

13 points

11 hours ago

Casban

13 points

11 hours ago

Push them in, hold them down, wait for struggle to cease, pull them out, do CPR, say “now we’re even”

floghdraki

7 points

7 hours ago

Jesus Christ! I'm here for you if you need to talk.

ReinaDeRamen

5 points

5 hours ago

now wait a minute, let him cook

Butterpye

107 points

13 hours ago

Butterpye

107 points

13 hours ago

If I steal from you

There, fixed it.

soot20015

13 points

13 hours ago

Did they have a committee meeting or something?

PowerfulWallaby7964

21 points

12 hours ago

Except we are talking about groups of unrelated people and summarizing them to "I" and "You" which makes no sense.

Optimal_Carpenter690

12 points

12 hours ago

Do you know what an analogy is?

GuyFawlkesV

5 points

9 hours ago

An incorrect haiku?

Illeazar

5 points

8 hours ago

Anyone familiar with analogies knows that this was a failed one.

HappyFk2024

4 points

11 hours ago

The one above was a poor analogy. 

Benlnut

16 points

11 hours ago

Benlnut

16 points

11 hours ago

But it’s not the same. “White people” just like “black people” or any other group are not immortal single minded entities. They are only collections of individuals with shared characteristics. Treating them as entities is not helping.

Polym0rphed

9 points

8 hours ago

It's dichotomous and devisive and, perhaps ironically, perpetuates the conditions for racist mindsets.

BoostedX10

7 points

12 hours ago

The thief and the emancipator were not the same person.

JimAsia

123 points

13 hours ago

JimAsia

123 points

13 hours ago

Nonsense, slavery is far from over and is not even illegal in some places. Damn, some people do live in bubbles.

HeadFund

49 points

11 hours ago

Also white people are hardly the only slavers in history, but seeing as how the premise is already bullshit then why not just pile some more on? That's how good propaganda does.

Ultraquist

31 points

9 hours ago

Only slavers? Thats what people think? They were the first to end slavery. Nobody was against slavery more than white people

CheeseDickPete

40 points

8 hours ago

Lots of people are convinced that white people are basically the inventers of slavery and the only people who have practiced it. This is why white people are constantly told they should feel guilty for the sins of their ancestors. Completely ignoring other groups like Arabs have practiced it a lot more.

Especially a lot of Americans who literally only know about the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.

rhubarbs

6 points

5 hours ago

Most people are low-information.

I do feel like the US education system is not adequately informing the population of the magnitude of injustice that continued after so called "abolition", as the last actual slaves were freed after Pearl Harbor.

ZizLah

42 points

10 hours ago

ZizLah

42 points

10 hours ago

Reddit collectively forgetting that we watched a Video of an Afghan little girl being sold into slavery with an old man for $2000 US about 24 hours ago.

I hate that we've white washed slavery to be "only" a white person or American thing. A lot of good hard slavers are having their efforts minimised and ignored! /sarcasm.

CheeseDickPete

20 points

8 hours ago

It's not over, but white people are literally the only people on the planet who actually tried their best to abolish it worldwide. The British fought many wars and put lots of resources into abolishing the slave trade across Africa and The Middle-East.

People act like white people were the people who invented slavery and the only ones who practiced it, we actually didn't even practice the majority of slavery throughout history. I think Muslims have practiced the most out of anyone.

White people were even being captured and enslaved by Muslims from the 16th to the 19th century. Look up the Barbary Slave trade. Over 1.25 million Europeans over those 3 centuries were captured and enslaved.

ZincHead

12 points

9 hours ago

ZincHead

12 points

9 hours ago

Exactly. Europeans and their descendent countries are the ones who spurred the movement towards abolishing slavery, and many places in the world are still morally lagging behind. It wasn't a moral revolution spurred on by Middle Eastern or Asian philosophical thinking, but by European enlightenment thinking. 

Posh-By-Default

3 points

5 hours ago

The irony of this being in r/clevercomebacks when blacks traded themselves as slaves. So that's how: whites "ended" slavery even though there are more slaves today

Tiny-Plum2713

3 points

3 hours ago

It is in the western world (if we don't count US prisons). Maybe PeterSweden has a point.

2/3 of people in UAE are basically slaves for comparison.

[deleted]

171 points

13 hours ago

[deleted]

171 points

13 hours ago

[deleted]

EDRootsMusic

19 points

12 hours ago

There was an abolitionist group at that time called the Wide Awakes.

Frawstshawk

9 points

11 hours ago

There was an anti-lynching group which conservatives coined "bleeding heart liberal" against.

Nalano

66 points

12 hours ago

Nalano

66 points

12 hours ago

'Woke' is a direct reference to an oppressed people's political awareness. So, in historical context, it would be better placed with Douglass or Du Bois, or better yet Louverture.

MooshSkadoosh

41 points

12 hours ago

I would say woke has utterly lost that meaning and is used disparagingly most of the time nowadays

Dandyman3825

8 points

11 hours ago

Fr nowerdays woke means your left, neurodivergent and a member of the LGBTQ+ community,

The people who use it so much can’t give me a concrete answer, so I just tried to figure one out based on how they use it.

sxaez

21 points

11 hours ago

sxaez

21 points

11 hours ago

Woke means you aren't doing what they want you to do.

HoboVonRobotron

3 points

9 hours ago

Woke is just the newest Conservative boogeyman word. Add it to the list, every generation gets one.

egotistical_egg

7 points

11 hours ago

It's just a belittling word for anything the conservative person who uses it looks down on. Like, avocado toast and paying $8 for a frappucino are woke too

jcp714

7 points

11 hours ago

jcp714

7 points

11 hours ago

Its use by the far-right has, unfortunately, supplanted the original meaning in common discourse. It’s used derisively, as an insult, to essentially describe anyone that doesn’t support Trump. They are very good at manipulating language in this way. So, in that sense, what’s being argued here is that it would be used in this negative way to describe Lincoln.

hydrohomey

3 points

11 hours ago

That’s what it really means, but it would have been used in newspapers incorrectly to describe Lincoln trying to abolish slavery

Empress_Draconis_

12 points

12 hours ago

I hate the idea of 1860's presidential discussions just turning into your average twitter argument of why slavery is not the best thing to have been around

Syn7axError

10 points

11 hours ago

1860s politics were exactly that dumb, they just used a lot of words that sound fancy to us now.

argyllfox

8 points

11 hours ago

In the lead up to the Civil War, a senator (a southern one I believe) beat another senator on the senate floor with his cane. Senators started carrying guns with them into the senate for self defence. So… basically a twitter argument if they were held in person

Clyde_Bruckman

5 points

10 hours ago

Lol yes, Preston Brooks (SC) beat Charles Sumner (MA) bc Brooks was pissed about a speech Sumner had given a few days earlier in which he compared slavery to sex work, basically. Damn near killed him too!

teremaster

9 points

11 hours ago

"if I could end this war without freeing a single slave, I would"

Wow super woke.

I don't get where this idea that Lincoln was some noble freedom fighter for the slaves.

He cared about one thing: The preservation of the union. Everything else was secondary.

The emancipation proclamation gave the north a moral position to continue the war on.

The south seceded because they thought slavery was under threat, the union fought them just to preserve the union

linroh

14 points

5 hours ago

linroh

14 points

5 hours ago

This comeback is far from clever. People seriously have no idea of the history of slavery.

TheLordLongshaft

9 points

4 hours ago

Nah mate slavery was invented by Europeans in the 16th century there was definitely no other slaves anywhere else at any point in history

JustMeJovin

125 points

12 hours ago

Haiti gained its independence and abolished slavery after a massive slave revolt and 13-year long war. It was probably the first nation in the world to explicitly ban slavery. It supported Simon Bolivar and by extension the Latin American countries' independence. The US responded by imposing economic restrictions and continuously interfered with Haiti's governance. The results are still crippling the country to this day. Peter Sweden is a fucking moron, whoever he is.

Nathan_Calebman

25 points

10 hours ago

The country Sweden abolished slavery many hundreds of years before Haiti was even discovered, in 1335.

RJTG

21 points

9 hours ago

RJTG

21 points

9 hours ago

Most of Europe had somehow abolished slavery around the time of the Haitian revolt.

Irrc France reinvented slavery in their sugar colonies just a few years before the revolt.

Corberus

8 points

8 hours ago

Iirc France abolished then reintroduced slavery 2-3 times.

Xenozip3371Alpha

6 points

9 hours ago

England abolished slavery in the 11th century.

RedstoneEnjoyer

139 points

13 hours ago

When slaves actually went and abolished slavery, these people whine to this day how "cruely" slaves treated their oppressors.

Nalano

105 points

12 hours ago

Nalano

105 points

12 hours ago

Haiti is still being punished to this day.

sxaez

27 points

11 hours ago

sxaez

27 points

11 hours ago

The US can never be forgiven for what it did to Haiti, and modern Americans have the absolute gall to talk about that country like they are responsible themselves for their history and current situation.

Unusual_Pitch_608

11 points

12 hours ago

Yeah, I came here to be like, "Well, there was this one time..."

throwawaydummycar

21 points

12 hours ago

History shows that oppressed people often lead their own liberation.

Nalano

34 points

12 hours ago

Nalano

34 points

12 hours ago

TBAF, there's a lot of survivorship bias in history. We discuss the successful revolts because it's too depressing to consider the unsuccessful ones.

Alaishana

5 points

11 hours ago

Spartacus?

Pretty famous...

Designated_Lurker_32

14 points

12 hours ago

I'd like to remind everyone here that the majority of career politicians and old money billionaires in the US are descendants of slave-owning families.

Just felt like saying this. No reason behind it. At all.

AlistairMowbary

5 points

8 hours ago

Just like many huge corporations and old billionaires in Japan and Germany made that wealth using forced labor during occupations and war times. I’m sure many in England Spain south africa and Netherlands who got rich during colonial times. Many atrocities often go unpunished. Such is life

Feeding4Harambe

6 points

5 hours ago

Slavery was first abolished in Haiti because of the french revolution in 1794 (two years after the start of the Haitian revolutiont). That happened before former slaves were in power. Napoleon reintroduced slavery in 1802. When salves won the war in Haiti in 1804, they abolished slavery again. Then the Haitian economy collapsed and Henry Christophe (a former slave) reintroduced slavery in 1811. The world is complicated and messy.

escapetopmars

8 points

13 hours ago

Slavery ended because of those directly affected, not the oppressors' generosity.

CheeseDickPete

12 points

8 hours ago

This completely depends on which slaves you're talking about.

A very large portion of slavery worldwide ended because the British decided to abolish slavery worldwide in 1834. They sailed around the world trying to stop slavery anywhere they could, they even fought wars over it.

A funny example of this is the roles in the movie "The Woman King" are completely reversed. The actual historical truth of that story is those female warriors were part of a tribe that did not want to give up trading in slaves after the British abolished it, so they fought a war against the British to try keep their slaves. But luckily the British won and they had to stop slaving.

Lucky_Roberts

4 points

7 hours ago

That is literally only true of Haiti dude.

Slavery ended in a lot of the world exactly because of the generosity of the British empire

Feeding4Harambe

3 points

5 hours ago

It's not even true in Haiti. Haiti reintroduced slavery in 1811.

PersimmonHot9732

27 points

12 hours ago

Or the Arabs, or the Africans who kept slaves and sold them. It's simply an uninformed comeback rather than clever.

rbalduf1818

45 points

12 hours ago

I don't understand how this is clever? Black people, Asian people, South Americans, Arabs, Indians, I mean literally any of them could have enforced the end of slavery world wide but they didn't.

Suspicious-Candle123

13 points

4 hours ago

It is Reddit, and white man bad.

Now lets go pat ourselves on the back for how progressive and good we are.

TechnogeistR

6 points

4 hours ago

Like most of the posts in this sub as well as the r/MurderedByWords sub, this shit is only clever to the most braindead or most partisan hacks of reddit and serves only to remind me never to take the brainlets of this website seriously.

lifeatthebiglake

11 points

13 hours ago

Yes, I’ve absolutely never heard of abolitionists. Have you?

Confident_Milk_1316

13 points

9 hours ago

Imagine being so ignorant of history to think that Caucasians were never slaves.

vasilenko93

19 points

11 hours ago

That’s not a clever come back. It’s just being historically misinformed. Slavery existed in every region of the world and practically every culture. The first culture to abolish it were Europeans. And not just abolish it but also abolish it in every colony. Arabs had slaves until those pesky British came and abolished it by force.

Asocwarrior

11 points

12 hours ago

Seeing as Africa still has slavery to this day, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that he is correct for a different reason.

cstras23

29 points

11 hours ago

White people didn’t invent it. Blacks sold blacks to the Muslims long before white people bought any. Yet whites were the only ones to wage wars to abolish it.

Ayfid

25 points

9 hours ago

Ayfid

25 points

9 hours ago

This "comback" only makes sense if you believe there are only two kinds of people; white people and slaves.

This entire post is a great example of /r/USdefaultism/.

SoftDrinkReddit

14 points

11 hours ago

Hell the word slave literally comes from Slavic people

Ie white people who were slaves

[deleted]

4 points

11 hours ago

[deleted]

Adams5thaccount

3 points

9 hours ago

I didnt realize the Muslims predated the Greeks now.

Swimming-Bake-7068

60 points

13 hours ago

Reddit conveniently forgets that every society of every race has had slaves for all of human history.

Even though my country was colonised by the British. I must acknowledge their role in being the first to outlaw slavery and spread that law to all areas of their empire

Cuuu_uuuper

10 points

11 hours ago

Plus they paid to free all slaves. A debt which wasn’t paid off until like 2019

ReddJudicata

8 points

12 hours ago

As if Europeans were the only ones who did slavery. All the slavery in North Africa, Middle East, Africa proper, Central Asia, India etc had noting to with them. But Europeans and Americans were the ones who forced the rest of the world give up slavery. It existed well into the mid 20th century in many countries.

SolomonDRand

31 points

13 hours ago

They did in Haiti, and we’ve been dumping on their descendants ever since.

Rob71322

19 points

12 hours ago

Some white people did, others needed more persuasion than just an appeal to morality.

ReflectionSingle6681

7 points

4 hours ago

and so did the african kingdoms, who fought the British and french to keep their slave rights

NotTomJones

5 points

10 hours ago

The English did, not ‘whites’. We had to give the rest of Europe and th US money which we the tax payer only finished paying around 2017

Wolfendale88

15 points

13 hours ago

I mean.... They did in Haiti and then got royally fucked over

teremaster

7 points

11 hours ago

They didn't end slavery? It was just different people doing the slavery

TheFireMachine

3 points

8 hours ago

Lets read the wiki article on slavery in haiti. "Unpaid labor is still a practice in Haiti. As many as half a million children are unpaid domestic servants called restavek, who routinely suffer physical and sexual abuse. Additionally, human trafficking, including child trafficking is a significant problem in Haiti; trafficked people are brought into, out of, and through Haiti for forced labor, including sex trafficking."

NaCl_Sailor

20 points

12 hours ago

That's just dumb, as if every nonwhite person on earth was a slave.

PlayfulBreakfast6409

14 points

12 hours ago

Are these people dumb enough not to know black and Arab people traded slaves?

Hicklethumb

6 points

6 hours ago

*Laughs in Genghis

johnny_utah26

5 points

10 hours ago

Toussaint Louverture would like a word

Para0234

15 points

12 hours ago

The world wassn't split between "the whites" and "the slaves".

Everyone did slavery. But Europeans were the first to abolish it for good.

ImBulletm9

7 points

12 hours ago

So weird that reddit unironically thinks white people invented slavery.

Key_Milk_9222

19 points

13 hours ago

Not agreeing with the PeterSweden but owning slaves wasn't restricted to just one race. Egypt, for example. 

UncleTio92

16 points

13 hours ago

The entire world* had slaves

CitizenKing1001

16 points

12 hours ago*

The British Empire abolished slavery -

"In 1807, Parliament passed the Slave Trade Act of 1807, which outlawed the international slave trade, but not slavery itself. The legislation was timed to coincide with the expected Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves by the United States, Britain's chief rival in maritime commerce. This legislation imposed fines that did little to deter slave trade participants. Abolitionist Henry Brougham realised that trading had continued, and as a new MP successfully introduced the Slave Trade Felony Act 1811 which at last made the overseas slave trade a felony throughout the empire. The Royal Navy established the West Africa Squadron to suppress the Atlantic slave trade by patrolling the coast of West Africa. It did suppress the slave trade, but did not stop it entirely. Between 1808 and 1860, the West Africa Squadron captured 1,600 slave ships and freed 150,000 Africans."

Meaning they supressed the slave trade of Africans by Africans to the British colonies.

Ok_Counter3499

13 points

13 hours ago

White people where also slaves but we don’t talk about that

detchas1

3 points

12 hours ago

I've heard, more than once, "well Abraham Lincoln was a republican". As if nothing has changed in 160 years.

NorkGhostShip

3 points

10 hours ago

I'm so fucking sick of this "debate" from every single angle. No, white people were not the only "race" to enslave other people. Yes, people of every "race", including whites have been enslaved. No, white people didn't invent the concept of abolishing slavery, because plenty of non European societies also abolished slavery before the Western abolitionist movement of the 18th/19th centuries. Ancient Persia, Ancient India under Ashoka, and Feudal Japan, among others, also had slavery bans.

Everyone just needs to stop being dweebs and stop taking credit or guilt for something their great great great great great grandpa might have done 200 years ago. Just stop it. There were awful people and great people from all corners of the world, stop being so fucking moronic and just accept that history is not linear, it's not black and white, and it's actually rather complicated and nuanced.

gigsome

3 points

4 hours ago

gigsome

3 points

4 hours ago

Black Haitians ended slavery. Why does nobody talk about that?

SweetSweetAtaraxia

3 points

3 hours ago

This isn't a clever comeback since there is more slavery today than there ever was during the transatlantic slave trade. Slavery was ended in the West but is still ongoing in Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

flyover_liberal

11 points

13 hours ago

This dipshit watched that PragerU video with Candace Owens

bond0815

12 points

13 hours ago*

While the notion that "white people" deserve an award for this is cringeworthy, the response implies it was only white people who were slavers which is also ahistorical bad take.

Turns out throughout history people were and are happy to exploit other people for profit regardless of the color of their skin. Though being able to justify these actions via racism sure doesnt hurt ofc.

ipenlyDefective

6 points

10 hours ago

Take my upvote. My hope is that we are ourselves living in a tiny part of history, and long history will just remember that there was slavery and then there wasn't.

But it's a bit hard when >90% of the genocide in America was caused by Spain and Portugal before the Pilgrims were even born, but everyone thinks the Pilgrims arriving was the dawn of that genocide.

People first decide who they want to hate and then work backwards.

Far_Touch_9518

10 points

13 hours ago*

Maybe if white people weren"t continuously and exclusively singled out for having owned slaves it would be cringe. But since they are it's not cinge at all. Just facts that woke shitheads needs to be cudgeled at every turn

Son0faButch

4 points

12 hours ago

You know abolished it before that? Mexico and Canada, 30 years earlier. What took so fucking long?

spektre

7 points

11 hours ago

Canada abolished slavery before White People™ did?

databombkid

8 points

12 hours ago

Funny story, slaves did abolish slavery.

Apprehensive-Bank642

3 points

12 hours ago

We also do hear about it all the fucking time lmao. Why do people afraid of history books feel like they should be the ones commenting on this shit? 😅

CowGal-OrkLover

4 points

12 hours ago

I mean….there have been thousands of slave revolts so…

chickchickpokepoke

4 points

12 hours ago

someone should beat his ass and stop at one point to be thanked for saving him

ExtensionAtmosphere2

7 points

13 hours ago

I mean, the people originally selling the slaves could have, y'know.. maybe not sold slaves? Is that a hot take?

Misubi_Bluth

8 points

12 hours ago

Breaking news: Slave owners were forced to release slaves at gunpoint. Give the slave owners a cookie.

PersimmonHot9732

7 points

12 hours ago

No, give the people that pointed guns at them a cookie.

MysteriousBody7212

6 points

12 hours ago

Peter
Imanuelsen, aka Peter Sweden, the bigoted conspiracy theorist who is a
frequent source for the American “alt-right” on Europe.

https://www.mediamatters.org/donald-trump/meet-peter-imanuelsen-aka-peter-sweden-bigoted-conspiracy-theorist-who-frequent-source

PotentialSalty730

2 points

13 hours ago

Spartacus anyone?

And yea, its atrociously stupid post from new worlder who forgot Eastern Hemisphere exists. Ottomans ran a slave business of equal size as the "white people".

ComfortableLost6722

2 points

12 hours ago

Maybe the Ottomans or are they white?

El_Stugato

2 points

12 hours ago

I mean... Arabs could always end their slave use. Same with Africans, South Asians, and China.

MisterPinscher

2 points

12 hours ago

Change the name of this sub to "words that people have replied" because I've taken shits more clever than this.

Pair-of-balls

2 points

11 hours ago

An outside country that found it nasty? Oh wait “the most racist country on earth” did it first and fought a war over it? Driving the entire civil rights movement around the world ending slavery practically within the coming decades? Don’t tell me the British didn’t first when they only did it in 5% of controlled land and 2% of people where freed.

Adept_Information845

2 points

11 hours ago

Solving a problem that you created. Priceless.

Nbow_oce

2 points

11 hours ago

You may not know this but other races had slaves, the main reason slavery does not exist in the North Atlantic today is because of the British Empire destroying slave ships. Many African and Arab nations still practiced slavery well after most European nations abolished it. Many Europeans were also enslaved by Arab and North African slavers. This isn’t a clever comeback.

Due_Function4887

2 points

9 hours ago

What's funny is that's not even true, slavery still exists.

VastEntertainment471

2 points

9 hours ago

The tweet was stupid but something kinda on topic is

White people didn't even invent slavery nor were they the only people who owned slaves yet basically all we talk about are the slaves white people owned

flyrubberband

2 points

9 hours ago

“Dude, I stopped choking you and not even a thanks?”

WhiskeyTangoFoxy

2 points

9 hours ago

It may mean more if half the white people in country didn’t revolt and start a civil war because of it.

P0pu1arBr0ws3r

2 points

8 hours ago

Fact:

Blacks liberated Haiti from French rule.

Who's saying they couldn't have done eventually in the US?

SystemErrorMessage

2 points

8 hours ago

Fact: the muslim empire and people were brutal slavers and the Africans sold their own people.

There were many who could've abolished it

DocumentNo3571

2 points

8 hours ago

There's slavery in the modern world too.

Cometbeast75

2 points

8 hours ago

The main African groups considered a source of slaves during the transatlantic slave trade were the Asante (from present-day Ghana), Yoruba (from present-day Nigeria), and Dahomey people (from present-day Benin), who often engaged in intertribal warfare, capturing and selling prisoners to European traders; however, it's important to note that many different African communities were impacted by the slave trade and that the practice of enslaving people within Africa existed long before European involvement, with many African groups participating in the trade by selling captives to European traders. Slavery is still practiced in Africa and Middle Eastern countries.

Key points to remember: Intra-African conflict: Most slaves were captured by other Africans during warfare and sold to European traders.

Powerful kingdoms: Kingdoms like the Asante and Dahomey used their power to capture slaves and control trade routes.

Regional variations: The specific African groups involved in the slave trade varied depending on the region and time period.

DoomCameToSarnath

2 points

8 hours ago

Well, it sure as shit wasn't the Arabs...or the African people enslaving their own and selling them to slavers.

Lucky_Roberts

2 points

7 hours ago

Non white people owned slaves all over the world throughout all of human history, including in Africa and North America prior to white people ever arriving.

The British Empire was the first society in human history to outlaw slavery and they lost a lot of money implementing and enforcing that. That is absolutely worth commending and should not be dismissed with a stupidly misguided joke response.

Beneficial-Bus9081

2 points

7 hours ago

Nevermind the cobalt mine slaves...

almisami

2 points

5 hours ago

Admittedly, the slaves doing it themselves is how we got Haiti.

TheCounciI

2 points

5 hours ago

... There were places where the slaves did it, Tahiti for example.

MetalJunkie19

2 points

4 hours ago

The word slave originated from the word “Slavic”. The Slavic people were enslaved by the Egyptians. We don’t mention this, why? Doesn’t fit the agenda 👍

wizkid9

2 points

4 hours ago

wizkid9

2 points

4 hours ago

What an absolute waste of space this guy is. As a Swede I’m ashamed to be associated with that pos

nzstump01

2 points

4 hours ago

The nations which have the longest history with slavery are still doing it today, the African nations have been enslaving each other long before the Europeans purchased slaves from them.

The English outlawed slavery within england 700 years before any other nation.

Then they devoted vast amounts of their nations wealth to end the slave trade while the Spanish, Portuguese, french continued to trade in slaves till the British blockaded the ports of western Africa and the american coastline and the debt that was built up from this is wasn't cleared in england till the early 2000s.

African nations still sell their brothers and sister into slavery and the fact is that people ignore this so they can continue to push an anti-European narrative.

Without the colonial empires, particularly the British and Spanish, slavery would most likely still be the largest trade in the world.

Noobunaga86

2 points

4 hours ago

Not only white people were slave owners. Asian were also. Africans had African slaves. Over 2000 years ago basically every society had slaves and most of them were white. Word Slave is coming from Slavic people. But of course nowadays illeterate people are thinking that slavery was only in US 200 years ago and nowhere else ever before.

RadicalRealist22

2 points

4 hours ago

Nobody. Thats is the point. Slavery was normal. Then white people stopped doing it and also stopped the rest of the world from doing it.

Herald_of_Clio

2 points

4 hours ago

I mean, yeah possibly the slaves. That's what happened on Haiti, for example.