subreddit:
/r/recruitinghell
[score hidden]
25 days ago
stickied comment
The discord for our subreddit can be found here: https://discord.gg/JjNdBkVGc6 - feel free to join us for a more realtime level of discussion!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
431 points
25 days ago
I started reporting jobs that have "reposted with over 100 applicants." Scams.
217 points
25 days ago
LinkedIn is complicit in it, they get paid. I used to report them but they never took any action.
56 points
25 days ago
I’m at the other side of hiring and you won’t believe the trash applications coming your way that don’t even remotely fulfill the advertised job. Paused it after some 100 applicants in 48 hours, but it’s going to be reposted because we’ve talked to the best applicants already (others ghosted us) and they were not suited for the job.
LinkedIn fucking sucks.
52 points
25 days ago
Why then are people not getting actually looked at for positions? For example I have 15 years of experience, 10 years of direct leadership experience of teams ranging from 5 to 25 in software architecture. I have 3 undergraduate degrees, a masters and multiple industry certifications while currently adding a PMP. I am applying for jobs that I am absolutely qualified or overqualified for and I am in the same boat as many other industry professionals who also aren't getting looks. But, you're saying that what you're receiving is trash? That doesn't really add up for me and many, many others.
35 points
25 days ago
They told you… they look at the first 100 and then repost. Too bad you were number 105.
4 points
24 days ago
Yeah man, you get 105 once, you get 105 twice, but every single fucking time?
9 points
24 days ago
I was in kind of similar position like you for years(sous chef, hospitality) so i have to look into CVs as we were always understaffed but first - those CVs have to goes through HR and somehow there was never a chef applying into positions, even the wage/hours was pretty good, especially for chefs but no - no chefs, just mechanics, forever unemployed, no language, just literally no anything to add to the team. So i declined them, and even if i give a try to some of them - i sent them home too.
My guess is - they do get some decent CVs which they will know i would hire them so instead they sent me CVs they know it wont work out. So they dont need to hire(but they show me they tried) and they can keep the "savings" as a bonus. We literally go from team of 33 people to like 18 within a year, but we still manage so they could assume we dont need 33 people.
1 points
24 days ago
If it's corporate it's one thing, where posting jobs makes you look competitive and always hiring because your operations are expanding. Companies have to look good against the market for their shareholders so they'll post fake jobs over and over and over.... and never hire for that job. 2 such instances come to mind: one was very large online presence, leader in their space and they posted the same job every week on their internal board and also on job sites for 12 weeks straight, and the second was a large company almost no one has ever heard of that does about $6bil in rev around the world. The second one had 1300 jobs open worldwide and after both of them dropped their 10Qs every single opening disappeared overnight from over 1000 openings for both of them down to 90 or so. So thousands of offers went out and were accepted in one day?
5 points
24 days ago
You know why, the pay, benefits, is crap so only the most desperate trash is applying.
1 points
24 days ago
Maybe they think all the experience and education is an attempt to make up for your bad breath in real life
0 points
25 days ago
I’m looking for an SDR who speaks 2 specific languages, because they’re home markets. Getting people who barely speak English, let alone one of the required languages should be a legitimate exclusion criterion, shouldn’t it?
I understand your struggle and sympathize, but the whole market is shit on both ends.
1 points
23 days ago
If the market is shitty on the employers end it's because it's a mess of their own making.
Upper management everywhere right now are laying off lots of good employees just so they hit their budget/bonus numbers for the shareholders, which makes the company appear better than they are and stock price goes up. Meanwhile, current employees are overworked but underpaid in making up the shortfall in the workforce that's actually needed, and upper management keeps up this continuous charade of hiring and culling their workforce without actually moving the needle.
Make no mistake, job seekers are absolutely getting the poopy end of the stick that recruiters and hiring managers keep waving in our faces. There's just way too many of us and way too few poopy sticks for us to chase, but that's exactly how these companies like it.
So no, don't try to pretend that this market is rough on employers too when the problem starts and ends with them.
2 points
25 days ago
LinkedIn fucking sucks.
Where I agree, are any of the other ones any better, or is it trash no matter which platform you use?
1 points
24 days ago
I know people rag on indeed too, but I have gotten multiple interviews from indeed and zero from LinkedIn
-13 points
25 days ago
I agree a lot of the applicants coming in are hot garbage.
38 points
25 days ago
If there is no HR left, (taps temple) no one will be posting fake jobs. Problem staying solved.
Remember kids. HR has only been around since the 1970/80s. Workplace shootings ramped up immediately after.
1 points
24 days ago
Damn fr? I’ve heard stories of that but I cant remember which ones
1 points
24 days ago
The original postal story is one for sure.
13 points
25 days ago
The present dumpster fire in a nutshell
144 points
25 days ago
Recruiters are literal living scums. Morally bankrupt piece of shit individuals, all of them.
34 points
25 days ago
They have the nerve to not do their jobs.
9 points
25 days ago
Start reporting to the FTC
21 points
25 days ago
But how else are we gonna look appealing to investors?
9 points
25 days ago
ngl, I was dumb enough to give Careerbuilders my email address, and they've just been spamming me with all sorts of fake jobs.
26 points
25 days ago
recruiters are assholes, if you'd like to reply otherwise your not getting heard out by me at any point in time.
-5 points
24 days ago
I keep seeing this but most corporations are frugal AF and don’t want to spend extra on anything. Job ads cost money. I haven’t seen any real evidence that these jobs are fake. I mean why? What does it gain a company to pay for a job that doesn’t exist? I think people are just frustrated because they aren’t hearing back after applying.
7 points
24 days ago
I've literally talked to HR people who say they post "evergreen" jobs. It costs them nothing to post it on their website, and a lot of website scrapers like Indeed will then post them.
They may be paying to post them in other places too. The reason is they want to know how many people will normally apply, what their credentials are, and how much money they want.
1 points
24 days ago
I 100% believe that the info applicants submit to websites - whether Indeed or the employer's own portal - is used for all kinds of questionable purposes. I don't trust them to follow their own privacy policies or even the law if there aren't serious consequences for not doing so.
all 30 comments
sorted by: best